Месяц: Ноябрь 2021

The influence of any cultural phenomenon is being discussed on many social levels either on tv shows and small talks on bus stations. The impact of movies on society nowadays is solid, as many teenagers observe information about the world around them by watching it. Accordingly, some people suggest that only movies which influence and teach people about reality should be watched. In my personal opinion, movies must not be restricted as any kind of art, I will prove my point later in a text.

To begin with, screenwriting is undoubtedly one of the most important parts of the creating process, so possessing excellent dialogues and plots which would reach the heart of your audience is essential. In addition, realism in the film industry is a very fragile theme, as you can have a story that happens in today’s world, but with few adjustments. In total, a person who watches a movie where plot and dialogues are similar to theirs, characters are relatable, nevertheless, the timeline is a far future, even so, the movie is able to teach a person through allegories and hidden meanings.

Secondly, interpretations of the movie’s meaning can vary from incomprehensible mess to metaphor of religion and depict the flows of society. As a result of that people must be prepared for any story and try to find something personally for themselves. One example of that are movies by Stanley Kubrick, which attend to high-class intellectual personalities, however many of his works are satires and easily can be related to any person’s life, as we see those characters every day on the streets, the workplaces and food courts.

In conclusion, I want to say that despite any hardships and unfathomable approach of many people around the world, a person must be open-minded to have space for thoughts of others that maybe will change his or her life.

Since the dawn of time movies were strongly related to each other, as the film industry has much smaller history, the adaptation of written stories is always a fine decision to collect the audience even without marketing. Nevertheless, the public faces one common obstacle, to read the addaptated  before or after the movie. In my personal opinion, the choice should depend on the purposes of the person, however I prefer to watch movies,before reading books.

To begin with,nowadays people try to grasp information as fast as possible, therefore mostly films became entertainment instrument to waste time on something that wouldn’t be scratchy.While books are still have its own solid audience, the amounts are incomparable, so to tell the story to hugger public, movie would be the best option.One example of that is the popularity of “Harry Potter” and how the movie adaptation brought colossal quantities of book readers, who maybe enjoyed the original even more, with the all new details.Accordingly, movies may not only create its own big fan base, but also help book writer with the sells. 

Secondly,the time has elapsed, so as audience preferences while the older  generation would prefer to read a book with, the younger generation undoubtedly spend more time on the phones, consequently the most visible difference between films and books is a visualisation and how through the clip person possesses the story. As a result, people take a story which visualisation through the video in a limited amount of time, rather than a more slowly temped book, which requires time for detailed story.

In conclusion I want to say that a person must read and watch as the experiences are both unique and may give a colossal effect on a person. However in the time of less free time and due to the reasons above I personally prefer films instead of books.

With the development of computer technologies, there are discussions about the necessity of public libraries. While I accept that there are clear benefits of online sources over past outdated public libraries, but I believe that it is still worth spending money on advancing new variants of municipal buildings.

Firstly, I believe that libraries in their past variation are not valid anymore, so they have to transform into a new form. A place where a person can feel peace and solitary, not the place where dust is ubiquitous, and the room has no repair for more than 30 years. For instance, Helsinki’s new central library has a modern design, both physical and electronic books. Moreover, it was designed and created for comfort space to make the process of reading more plausible.

Secondly, public libraries can be regarded as a more reliable source of information, compared with online sources. Surely, there is an abundance of inaccurate information on the Internet, while libraries give more reliable information sources.

Nevertheless, the most serious problem is the quantity of information in a much easier and faster form. Examples of that are articles and blogs, where a person is able to find concise versions of the theme. That is why the internet dominating in nowadays society. Notwithstanding in the area of fiction rareness of copies, make physical versions more valuable and libraries are able to provide those formations.

In conclusion, I want to say that with the adjustment to a system of public libraries, the number of visitors would grow. Besides all differences between the Internet and libraries both of them are sources where person is able to gain knowledge and improve himself

With the development of democratic movements on the political level, the amount of obligation has shrunk, so there are no more duties from the government that a person has to complete. Therefore it only depends on the tradition of a specific country and family, which standards are acceptable and which are not. In addition, all modern companies concentrate on “How to sell”, not “ What to sell”.Consequently, enjoyment became a currency, which is in the price of gold. I strongly agree with the statement and will prove my point later in a text. 

Firstly, almost every person’s morning starts by swiping social media for the purpose of seeking satisfaction. Moreover, it was proved that almost 35 percent of Earth’s population wastes more than 4 hours per day on the screen of their devices. The world has become digital, all we require is a cellphone and internet connection to pleasure our needs. However, it still depends on an individual’s time management. People’s vulnerability to entertainment is one of the most frightful aspects of nowadays society.

Secondly, civilization becomes uncautious day by day. Less people think, easier to control their emotions. Culture develops personages who think by categories, standards of others, produce their descendants to begin the amazing cycle again. For instance, social media is the best example of how pleasure dominates serious duties. Videos with cute doggies contain more audience than the essay about the personality of Nietzsche. In my opinion, this unstable condition of society should worry. 

In conclusion, I believe that people today spend too much time on personal enjoyment, and not enough time on more serious responsibilities and commitments. This is because today because they have more free time than in the past.

People grow up, there is a point in life when most of us compartmentalize into two lifestyles. A person who has the same job, same house placing, same parking place for years and those who change environment every year, live in adventures and don’t wast their lifespan on the identical views. In my personal opinion, non stable life without risks neither everyday adventures avoiding consequences are preferable. 

Firstly, mental disorders are consequences of a clerk’s life, when you wake up at 7 am 5 days a weak, go to the office and spend your time working on something that wouldn’t satisfy your management. For instance, the middle-aged crisis is one of those consequences that person faces. The question of life’s meaning is coming because everything seems grey and colorless. Therefore the person has to make some changes or goals in his life to be in movement.

On the other side of the coin, a character who is always in movement can’t be sure of his purpose of existence, specifically when he did not build any of the social goals of an average person. Besides, his or her gained new experience, it can’t be dependent in older ages because people who are seeking for fresh actions are not stable and have obstacles to create families.  

Nevertheless, both of those approaches have their advantages, and by mixing them, clarifying your purposes, and creating an area where you can work with satisfaction, a person gains new experience and doesn’t lose his durability. Furthermore, people who are not afraid of changes, but still have stable notions and purposes are the most reliable people. By finding compromises and communicating with yourself the improvements can be done. 

In conclusion, I want to say that all kinds of beings need changes, by finding those novelties you gain experience, least but no the last build the stable relationship with someone that you can depend on is a vital part of person’s life. So, people who enjoy the process are the ones who move the world